注：本文仅测试shadowsocks的速率，使用ss-redir作为透明代理时速率会更低些。
Client: MagicBox AC750 – MIPS 24Kc – QCA9533 @ 650MHz– OpenWrt master-190406
Server: PC – x86 – Intel E3-1231 v3 @ 3.4GHz – Arch Linux rolling
均使用官方软件源中的shadowsocks-libev软件，测试结果（仅常用算法）：
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
# old ciphers rc4-md5 39.5 Mbits/sec aes-128-cfb 26.7 Mbits/sec aes-192-cfb 25.0 Mbits/sec aes-256-cfb 23.7 Mbits/sec salsa20 34.4 Mbits/sec chacha20 37.1 Mbits/sec # new ciphers aes-128-gcm 16.9 Mbits/sec aes-192-gcm 16.1 Mbits/sec aes-256-gcm 15.6 Mbits/sec chacha20-ietf-poly1305 29.5 Mbits/sec xchacha20-ietf-poly1305 28.9 Mbits/sec |
以下脚本应在两台机器上分别执行来模拟实际环境，在同一台设备上使用会造成ss-server + ss-tunnel双倍的cpu使用量。
ss-bench-client.sh
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 |
#!/bin/sh # Copyright (c) 2019 SiYu Wu <wu.siyu@hotmail.com> # simple shadowsocks benchmark script # Usage: ss-bench-client.sh <server> <encrypt_method> if [ "$#" -ne 2 ]; then echo "Usage: $0 <server> <encrypt_method>" >&2 exit 1 fi ss-tunnel -s $1 -p 5050 -m $2 -k test -L 127.0.0.1:5201 -l 5051 & pid=$! echo "ss-tunnel started, pid=$pid" sleep 1 iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -p 5051 -R kill $pid &> /dev/null |
ss-bench-server.sh
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
#!/bin/sh # Copyright (c) 2019 SiYu Wu <wu.siyu@hotmail.com> # simple shadowsocks benchmark script # Usage: ss-bench-server.sh <encrypt_method> if [ "$#" -ne 1 ]; then echo "Usage: $0 <encrypt_method>" >&2 exit 1 fi ss-server -s 0.0.0.0 -p 5050 -m $1 -k test & pid=$! echo "ss-server started, pid=$pid" iperf3 -s kill $pid &> /dev/null |
0
Leave A Comment